206-632-6206 info@brooksapplied.com

On the Road Again – SETAC 2014

SETAC LogoMore than 2300 scientists, assessors, regulators, and managers will gather to share and discuss emerging research, regulatory developments, and the latest methodologies in environmental toxicology and chemistry at the SETAC North America 35th Annual Meeting. Tiffany Stilwater (BRL Client Services Manager), Elizabeth Madonick (BRL Technical Sales Specialist), and Ian Joslin (BRL Metals Chemist), will be heading up to Vancouver, BC, to attend this busy and exciting meeting being held November 9-13, 2014.

We don’t let our Metals Chemists out much, so come by introduce yourself to Ian on Tuesday morning (November 11th) as he presents his poster on “Potential Bias in Arsenic Speciation Results for Tissues Prepared by EPA Method 1632”. You can also come by the booth of our sister company, Brooks Rand Instruments (booth #218) to say hello, or contact us before the event to set up a meeting.

Presentation on Metals Speciation at DOE Workshop


Michelle Briscoe, the president and CEO of Brooks Rand Labs, gave a presentation on September 17th at the Department of Energy Consolidated Audit Program (DOECAP) Analytical Services Program (ASP) Workshop in Albuquerque entitled, “Metals Speciation as a Tool for Addressing Environmental Issues.” Brooks Rand Labs is an official DOECAP-audited laboratory, and is one of only eight companies in the nation that are both DOECAP-audited and DoD accreditedContact us

What is Trace Clean Sampling?

Trace Clean Sampling is the implementation of EPA Method 1669, also known as “Clean Hands/Dirty Hands”, sample collection procedures in concurrence with EPA 1600-series analytical methods for low-level metals and metals speciation. During the development of these methods, the EPA found that one of the greatest difficulties in obtaining reliably accurate data for metals at low-level concentrations was due to sample contamination. Therefore, samples to be analyzed by any of the low-level metals 1600-series analytical methods must also be collected according to the procedures described in EPA Method 1669. EPA Method 1669 requires special procedures to minimize and monitor for contamination, including the use of ultra-clean pre-tested sample collection containers and other field-sampling equipment, a two-person sample collection procedure (“clean hands/dirty hands”), and the collection of field quality control samples (equipment blanks, field blanks, field duplicates, etc.).

For a detailed overview of EPA Method 1669 “Clean Hands/Dirty Hands” download our Environmental Sampling for Low Level Trace Metals informational brochure.

Find out more about our EPA Method 1669 “Clean Hands/Dirty Hands” clean sampling training and consulting provided by our experienced sampling consultants!

EPA Presentation at Brooks Rand Labs

Dr. Chris EckleyDr. Chris Eckley, an environmental scientist and geochemist with the US EPA, presented his latest research at Brooks Rand Labs on August 20th as part of BRL’s monthly seminar series for the professional development of our staff. Dr. Eckley’s presentation, Mercury Transport and Transformation at the Black Butte Mine Superfund Site, reported on some interesting findings related to methylmercury production in the Cottage Grove Reservoir in Oregon, which was the first body of water in Oregon to have a fish consumption public health advisory listed due to high mercury levels. Brooks Rand Labs has been involved in the mercury research being conducted at the Black Butte Mine and surrounding areas for many years. Learn more about BRL’s mercury and mercury speciation services, or request a quote today!

Rice Methylmercury Exposure and Mitigation

It is commonly believed that dietary ingestion of one of the most toxic forms of mercury, methylmercury, is primarily due to eating fish. This is not necessarily the case in many areas of the world where rice is a staple food and the levels of methylmercury in rice have been found at potentially concerning levels. However, it is unclear whether methylmercury in rice is more toxic to humans than exposure through fish ingestion. Mercury contamination of rice has not yet had the same visibility and popularity as other food toxicity issues. To address this, Sarah Rothenberg (University of South Carolina), Lisamarie Windham-Myers (USGS), and Joel Creswell (Brooks Rand Instruments) have written a fascinating paper that consolidates and summarizes the most significant research on this topic in the past 30 years. To view the abstract and obtain a copy of this paper (PMID: 24972509), please click here.

New Mercury Detection Limit Requirements

Here at Brooks Rand Labs, we have noticed many of our Canadian clients are working under new discharge permits with lower method detection limit (MDL) requirements for total mercury (Hg). Some water quality guidelines are even demanding site-specific detection limits as low as 0.10 ng/L for Hg. Brooks Rand Labs is able to comply with these new requirements, offering a 0.10 ng/L MDL for all clients (worldwide) for Hg analysis via EPA Method 1631E. There is no additional charge for this low-level MDL. If your project requires ultra-low level MDLs (for any analyte), contact us today!

Sampling Consultations with the Experts!

Sampling 2014The US EPA Method 1669, Sampling Ambient Water for Trace Metals at EPA Water Criteria Levels, can be a complex and challenging method for those who are not experienced in “clean hands/dirty hands” sampling for low-level metals. Even for the most knowledgeable field samplers, every new site brings its own obstacles and the method has to be constantly modified to collect samples within the performance-based guidelines. Taking one of our in-person Method 1669 sampling classes to learn new techniques or as an annual refresher course is a great way to hone your skills, but these classes are offered infrequently. If waiting until the next sampling class is not an option for you and you need 1669 guidance regarding sample collection for low-level metals, Brooks Rand Labs has several sampling and quality assurance experts on staff that are available for phone consultations at very reasonable rates. Services include review of sampling and analysis plans (SAP), review of quality assurance project plans (QAPP), and customized consultation on sample collection for low-level metals at even the trickiest of sites. Contact us for a quote today!

Deadline extended!

as-interlabBacklogged after the holiday weekend? Don’t worry! We have extended the deadline for our Intercomparison Study for Arsenic Speciation in Food — but don’t delay because you only have until July 15th to register! Use our registration form or contact us at 206-632-6206.

Interferences with DMAs Determination in Tissues by EPA Method 1632A

Are your samples being properly prepared to avoid high bias due to interferences? EPA Method 1632A is the only EPA Method published for arsenic speciation in tissue samples, and it is usually the first choice for many regulatory-driven and government-funded projects. EPA Method 1632A describes two different digestion techniques that may be used for determination of dimethylarsinic acid (DMAs), and recent research conducted by Brooks Rand Labs has demonstrated that data produced by one of the digestion methods can be biased high for DMAs if the samples being analyzed contain significant amount of arsenobetaine (AsB), the most common form of arsenic found in most fin fish.

Come see Annie Carter, BRL’s VP of Operations, present on this topic (view the abstract) at the National Environmental Monitoring Conference (NEMC) in Washington D.C. on August 7th.

Call for Participants for Intercomparison Study for Arsenic Speciation in Food

Brooks Rand Labs is organizing the 2nd annual Interlaboratory Comparison Study for Arsenic Speciation in Food.  With so few available reference materials that are certified for inorganic arsenic and other individual arsenic species, this study provides one of the few means for laboratories to evaluate their methods of analyzing arsenic species in food matrices, such as rice and fish.

The results of the 2013 Intercomparison Study were presented at the AOAC International Annual Meeting last year. That study had participation from 39 labs from around the globe and was considered a huge success. If you are a lab that performs arsenic speciation analyses in food, you are invited to participate in the 2014 study! For more information about this year’s study, or to register as a participant, please click here. The registration deadline for this year’s study is July 10th, 2014 July 15th, 2014.